A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out amongst prospective neighbours about the development of a wall at a coastal internet site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide interest pursuing an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier and the Irish Occasions post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a really publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over building performs at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a company director respectively, look for to build their family members home. The situation has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where progress pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of established citizens. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two people of Dublin Street, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions in their organizing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their web page, resulting in an encroachment on the Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such regions are subject to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological repercussions, particularly in the delicate coastal atmosphere for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially constructed, is in the right situation. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, wherever sights of the sea are the two hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable attempts from the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the website, Based on sworn evidence referenced during the Irish Situations. In one account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-high water for the duration of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture that has because come to be emblematic with the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence with the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from your sea Irish Periods documented, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the water through serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these types of actions had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a place impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan Paul Feely and René Collier 2026 ended up included intimately from the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether or not interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment within the legal timeline.
At the Main with the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as made, goes past what was approved and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, is described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and disorders connected for the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those pressured that their action is enthusiastic by worry for environmental safety and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public see, insisting instead that it's about ensuring that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few only seeking to establish a relatives house in accordance with the law. They deny which the wall encroaches on the Distinctive Location of Conservation and say that each one is effective are already carried out determined by professional guidance and accredited designs. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental details.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed the businessman experienced Earlier been involved in local advocacy on arranging and environmental difficulties, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from pretty distinctive Specialist backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Periods protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-significant h2o through a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations and René Collier waded by midsection-significant water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods are phrases that appeared continuously in coverage, reflecting equally the Actual physical reality from the coastline as well as the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme strategy.
As being the High Court proceedings continue on, the result stays uncertain. The courtroom need to establish whether the wall as developed complies with arranging permission and no matter whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Space of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and organizing situations. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another very long after the lawful expenditures are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development functions at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Furthermore, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential problems like environmental defense and property legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of pure beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of your dispute stands partially developed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter whether it will in the end be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will depend on the court’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.