A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning possible neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal web site in a very north Dublin suburb, a case which has captivated countrywide focus next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of setting up breaches, environmental concerns, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier as well as Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over building performs at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, seek out to construct their relatives property. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized citizens. In accordance with the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being made by their prospective neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted below planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions in their setting up permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment with a Specific Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such regions are matter to strict controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, specially within a delicate coastal environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their organizing permission, and say the wall, and that is partly created, is in the correct posture. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their see, an allegation which has been recurring in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of the sea are each extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the site, according to sworn evidence referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-superior drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions, a picture which has given that turn out to be emblematic of the depth from the dispute. These actions weren't just symbolic; they had been meant to Get visual proof of the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site within the sea Irish Periods claimed, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o in the course of severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the internet site turned One of the more putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely famous that these types of steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was staying encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately via the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as audience sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on no matter whether interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical instant inside the lawful timeline.
At the core with the dispute is usually a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and problems attached to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their action is motivated by worry for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving a private see, insisting instead that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have explained their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair basically trying to produce a spouse and children residence in accordance While using the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Spot of Conservation and say that every one works have been carried out based upon professional suggestions and accredited designs. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute more than construction of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description to get a circumstance that a lot of observers see as more and more typical. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Formerly been involved in local advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can discover by themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous While using the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded by means of waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both of those the physical actuality from the coastline along with the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings continue on, the result stays unsure. The courtroom have to decide whether or not the wall as built complies with preparing permission and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up problems. Still the human aspect remains central: neighbours who will have to Are living along with each other extensive once the legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than building performs at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong over and above that address. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns such as environmental safety and assets legal rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of purely natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre of your dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful inquiries. Whether or not it can ultimately be altered, eliminated, or concluded as prepared will count on the court docket’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely continue on to appear in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.